Eugenics (literally meaning “well born”), is a genetic and social theory whereby the human race is improved by controlling (or selective) reproduction whereby desirable people are propagated and undesirable people are eliminated. In early twentieth century Adolph Hitler and Margaret Sanger had their own form of eugenics, which focused on race are a desirable characteristic. The word ‘eugenics’ was coined in 1883 by Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. Galton believed that the proper evolution of the human race was thwarted by philanthropic outreach to the poor when such efforts encouraged them to bear more children. In modern-day eugenics, wealth and education are the new desirable characteristics, while the poor and uneducated people are the new undesirables. Indeed, there is nothing more evil than eugenics.
The UNFPA began operating in 1969 as the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (the name was changed in 1987), and was at that time under the administration of the United Nations Development Fund. In 1971 the agency was placed under the authority of the United Nations General Assembly, which is the main deliberative, policymaking, and representative organ of the United Nations, comprising all 192 member nations. Currently the UNFPA supports programs in more than 150 countries, territories and areas spread across four geographic regions: Arab States and Europe, Asia and the Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean, and sub-Saharan Africa. Around three-quarters of the UNFPA staff works in the field. Coupling with the United States’ Obama administration, the UNFPA has been very active in recent years bullying small and poor countries by refusing to assist them financially unless they legalize abortion or make it more accessible for women.
This article will use recent news stories and commentary to critique the three areas of focus for the UNFPA, which are (1) Reproductive health; (2) Gender equality; and (3) Population and development strategies.
Be forewarned and on guard against the Masters of Modern Day Eugenics.
According to their website (, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) “is an international development agency that promotes the right of every woman, man and child to enjoy a life of health and equal opportunity. UNFPA supports countries in using population data for policies and programs to reduce poverty and to ensure that every pregnancy is wanted, every birth is safe, every young person is free of HIV, and every girl and woman is treated with dignity and respect.” The website goes on to post a clever little slogan: “UNFPA – because everyone counts”.
The mission of the UNFPA sounds strikingly familiar to that of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which posits that “all lives, no matter where they are lived on the globe, have equal value.” Yet, as we saw with the Gates, that inasmuch as their words seem saintly, their actions are beyond evil in regards to their devaluing of human life. Likewise, this article will also examine the actions of the UNFPA according to their mission. Is it true that the UNFPA treats every girl and woman with dignity and respect? Are the methods that the UNFPA uses to reduce poverty and to ensure that every pregnancy is wanted – actually humane? And what exactly are some of these policies and programs that the UNFPA creates from the population data that it collects?
Also in my last article about Bill and Melinda Gates I reported on a statement that Bill made in a speech at a TED2010 Conference in early February of 2010 entitled, Innovating to Zero, in which he followed remarks about reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, by declaring, “First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
Notice how Bill’s attempt to deceive us by providing eugenics as the means to reign in CO2 emissions is almost identical to these quotes found in the UNFPA’s 2009 report entitled Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate:

    “The importance of the speed and magnitude of recent population growth in boosting future greenhouse-gas emissions is well-recognized among scientists, including the authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s reports.”
    “Still, calculations of the contribution of population growth to emissions growth globally produce a consistent finding that most of past population growth has been responsible for between 40 per cent and 60 per cent of emissions growth.”
    “Each birth results not only in the emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her descendents. Hence, the emissions savings from intended or planned births multiply with time.”
    “No human is genuinely “carbon neutral,” especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation. Therefore, everyone is part of the problem, so everyone must be part of the solution in some way.”
    “Strong family planning programmes are in the interests of all countries for greenhouse-gas concerns as well as for broader welfare concerns.”

This is the deception of overpopulation hysteria. Moreover, these ‘Strong family planning programs’ are code words for eugenics – the measures that the Masters of Modern Day Eugenics use to rid the planet of the poor, uneducated, handicap, and marginalized.
According to the Master’s of Modern Day Eugenics the phrase ‘Reproductive Health Services’ is code for providing affordable (preferably free) abortion services, passing out free artificial contraception, and forced sterilizations to poor and uneducated people. The Master’s are not interested in any positive approach to human reproduction. On the contrary, they are only keen to do everything in their power to stop the world’s poor from having more children.
For example, one of the services that the UNFPA offers refugees and war-affected persons are what they call ‘Reproductive Health Kits for Emergency Situations. These kits actually consist of several sub-kits that help to prevent children from being conceived and to kill prenatal children that have been conceived. Some of the items in these kits do include items that may be helpful to pregnant, but other kits include items such as: condoms (male and female), oral and injectable contraceptives. The issue here is not providing refugees and war-affected persons with contraceptives. Rather, the question precedes the issue; that is, why does the UNFPA believe that artificial contraception is what refugees and war-affected persons need? In the long list of things that those person do actually need, such as food, water, security, shelter, and education, why is the UNFPA intent on making sure that they do not bring new human life into their situation?
Really, how dare the UNFPA say that it is for gender equality when for the past thirty years (1978) it has been intimately involved in the Chinese population-control program since, when it signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Chinese government? In fact, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs reports that, through 1999, the UNFPA has contributed $177 million to China in support of its ‘One Child Policy’ and has developed and/or participated in 123 population control projects within the country.
The ‘One Child Policy’ or what the Chinese government calls their ‘Family Planning Policy’ was introduced in 1978 and initially applied to first-born children in 1979. Supposedly, it was created by the Chinese government to alleviate social, economic, and environmental pressures and problems in China. Authorities on the policy claim that it has prevented more than 250 million births from its implementation to 2000.
As a matter of implementation, the ‘One Child Policy’ involves forced abortions, female infanticide, and has been suggested as a possible cause behind China’s gender imbalance – to the degree that today in China it is difficult for a man to find a wife. Therefore, it is no surprise that male homosexuality has significantly increased in China.
The UNFPA does not only support the ‘One Child Policy’ in China, but it recently praised Vietnam for copying and implementing this form of eugenics.
The words eugenics and equality are mortal enemies and the United Nation and every nation that financially supports the UNFPA (the United States being the largest contributor under recent Democratic administrations) should be ashamed of themselves for the contributing to the deaths of millions of innocent children and abuse of poor and uneducated women.
The best example of the evil intent of the UNFPA’s collection of data can be found in a recently series of actions by certain health officials in the Republic of Uzbekistan.
According to rights groups, victims and health officials, hundreds of poor and uneducated women in Uzbekistan has been victims of forced sterilization; that is, the involuntarily removal of their uterus. The scary part of the story is that these sterilizations are not some rouge actions of some lunatic doctors, but, rather, ordered by the central government of the country.
This plot thickens still. According to a report entitled ‘Review of implementation of the “World fit for children” Declaration and Action Plan in the Republic of Uzbekistan that was published on the countries website in 2010:

“The complex of measures for the “Mother’s and Child’s Screening”, directed to prevent the childbirth with the hereditary diseases, accompanying with intellectual backwardness as well as inspection of pregnant women is carried out in the Republic with the purpose of revealing anomalies of development of a child-bearing. (…). Within the framework of the State Programs the cooperation is continuing with the WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, USAID, JICA, KfW Bank, World Bank, Asian Development Bank (…).”

Having been named as a co-conspirator in this report, the UNFPA has been kind enough to give us some insight into their part of Uzbekistan’s eugenics program:

“In Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan, UNFPA worked to strengthen national capacities to collect, analyze and disseminate gender disaggregated data on population, development and reproductive health and to integrate population variables and gender concerns into development and environmental planning.”

Another Uzbekistan government website ( states that data that the UNFPA collected for their ‘Mother and Child Screening Program’ has been used since 1998 to reduce the birth of disabled children; early revealing and accepting on the account children with phenylketonuria and hypotherioses which leads to mental backwardness; preventions of children from development of various diseases. In other words, the data collected by the UNFPA for this program has been used for eugenics – the elimination of innocent human children who would be born less than perfect.
Of all the Masters of Modern Day Eugenics, the United Nations is one of the most well-funded and deceitful. I cannot begin to scratch the surface of all the eugenic programs that the UN and its agency cooperate in and fund. Perhaps this shameful global body will one day fall like the rest have, but until then what we have to do is press our leaders in government to stop funding this organization and stop accepting its resolutions and policies. The United Nations is not for us – they are against us. Moreover, they are not for the children who God loves – they are against them.

  1. Masters of Modern Day Eugenics Part I: Bill and Melinda Gates
  2. Masters of Modern Day Eugenics Part III: The United Nations Population Fund
  3. Masters of Modern Day Eugenics Part III: George Soros